David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper I suggest a new interpretation of the relations of inherence, causation and conception in Spinoza. I discuss the views of Don Garrett on this issue and argue against Della Rocca's recent suggestion that a strict endorsement of the PSR leads necessarily to the identification of the relations of inherence, causation and conception. I argue that (1) Spinoza never endorsed this identity, and (2) that Della Rocca's suggestion could not be considered as a legitimate reconstruction or friendly amendment to Spinoza's system because it creates several severe and irresolvable problems in the system. In the first part of the paper, I present the considerations and arguments that motivated Don Garrett's and Della Rocca's interpretations. In the second part, I present and examine several problems that result from Della Rocca's reading. In the third and final part, I (1) present my own view on the relation among inherence, causation, and conception; (2) offer a new interpretation of the conceived through relation in Spinoza; and finally, (3) defend and justify the presence of (non-arbitrary) bifurcations at the very center of Spinoza's system.
|Keywords||Spinoza Causation Time Eternity Inherence Principle of Sufficient Reason Modes Della Rocca|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yitzhak Melamed (2012). The Sirens of Elea: Rationalism, Monism and Idealism in Spinoza. In Antonia Lolordo & Duncan Stewart (eds.), Debates in Early Modern Philosophy. Blackwell.
Michael Della Rocca (1996). Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford University Press.
Mogens Laerke (2011). Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the 'Ethics'. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439 - 462.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). Spinoza on Inherence, Causation, and Conception. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3):365-386.
Michael Della Rocca (1991). Causation and Spinoza's Claim of Identity. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (3):265 - 276.
Michael Della Rocca (2007). Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Scepticism. Mind 116 (464):851-874.
Eckart Förster & Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.) (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Justin Steinberg (2011). Spinoza, by Michael Della Rocca. [REVIEW] Mind 120 (479):852-856.
Michael Della Rocca (2010). Getting His Hands Dirty: Spinoza's Criticism of the Rebel. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
John Morrison (2013). The Relation Between Conception and Causation in Spinoza's Metaphysics. Philosophers' Imprint 13 (3):1-17.
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.) (2010). Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Della Rocca (ed.) (forthcoming). Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.
Evan Roane (2011). The Reemergence of Spinoza’s Conatus in the Political Sphere. Southwest Philosophical Studies 33.
Added to index2011-10-04
Total downloads104 ( #10,725 of 1,102,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #10,303 of 1,102,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?