Mind 102 (406):335-337 (1993)
|Abstract||In his "Purposive Intending" T.L.M. Pink (1991) instructively criticized a popular view about intentions and advanced an alternative position of his own. I challenged a pair of theses to which Pink's position committed him (Mele 1992a). Pink now agrees that both theses are false. His mistake, he says, was to express his view in terms of reasons; his position is now to be framed in terms of "justifications" (1993).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele (1992). Intentions, Reasons, and Beliefs: Morals of the Toxin Puzzle. Philosophical Studies 68 (2):171 - 194.
Elisabeth Pacherie (2000). The Content of Intentions. Mind and Language 15 (4):400-432.
Mike W. Martin (1997). Self-Deceiving Intentions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):122-123.
Randolph Clarke (2007). Commanding Intentions and Prize-Winning Decisions. Philosophical Studies 133 (3):391 - 409.
John Brunero (2007). Are Intentions Reasons? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):424–444.
Alfred R. Mele (2009). Effective Intentions: The Power of Conscious Will. Oxford University Press.
Alfred R. Mele (1992). Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior. Oxford University Press.
Alfred R. Mele (2008). Proximal Intentions, Intention-Reports, and Vetoing. Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):1 – 14.
Thomas Pink (2007). Intentions and Two Models of Human Action. In Bruno Verbeek (ed.), Reasons and Intentions. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Alfred Mele (1992). Intending for Reasons. Mind 101 (402):327-333.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #107,683 of 556,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?