Libertarianism, luck, and control

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):381-407 (2005)
Abstract
This article critically examines recent work on free will and moral responsibility by Randolph Clarke, Robert Kane, and Timothy O’Connor in an attempt to clarify issues about control and luck that are central to the debate between libertarians (agent causationists and others) and their critics. It is argued that luck poses an as yet unresolved problem for libertarians.
Keywords Central  Epistemology  Free Will  Libertarianism  Luck
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2005.00233.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,444
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Randolph Clarke (2005). Agent Causation and the Problem of Luck. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):408-421.
Alfred R. Mele (2014). Luck and Free Will. Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5):543-557.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

111 ( #36,240 of 1,911,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #40,479 of 1,911,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.