Metaphilosophy 39 (2):203–219 (2008)
|Abstract||This article's goal is to outline one approach to providing a principled answer to the question of what is the proper relationship between philosophy and the study of philosophy's history, a question arising, for example, in the design of a curriculum for graduate students. This approach requires empirical investigation of philosophizing past and present, and thus takes philosophy as an object of study in something like the way that contemporary (naturalistic) philosophy of science takes science as an object of study. This approach also requires articulating a sense in which philosophy might make, or might have made, progress.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Norbert Max Samuelson (2002). Revelation and the God of Israel. Cambridge University Press.
A. Cornelius Benjamin (1960). Is the Philosophy of Science Scientific? Philosophy of Science 27 (4):351-358.
E. Seguin (2000). Bloor, Latour, and the Field. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):503-508.
N. Tosh (2003). Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of a Present-Centred History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):647-659.
Keith Jenkins (1991). Re-Thinking History. Routledge.
Jens Bartelson (2007). Philosophy and History in the Study of Political Thought. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):101-124.
John Arnold, Kate Davies & Simon Ditchfield (eds.) (1998). History and Heritage: Consuming the Past in Contemporary Culture. Donhead.
Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.) (2000). Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Ho Mun Chan (2005). Rawls' Theory of Justice: A Naturalistic Evaluation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):449 – 465.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #64,378 of 549,073 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,073 )
How can I increase my downloads?