David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):125 - 132 (2003)
Much light can be shed on events which characterize or underlie scandals at firms such as Enron, Arthur Andersen, Worldcom, ImClone, and Tyco by appealing to the notion of ethical distance. Various inquiries have highlighted the difficulties in finding or identifying particular individuals to blame for particular events, and in the context of situations as complex as these it can sometimes be helpful to investigate the comparative ethical distance of various participants in these events. In this essay I offer a characterization of ethical distance in terms of moral responsibility, and in doing so I describe and illustrate the rough inverse correlation between moral distance and degrees of moral responsibility. I urge that the concept of ethical distance is capable of shedding light upon situations in which several people are involved in bringing about a state of affairs. I then argue that moral responsibility cannot do justice to all situations involving ethical distance. When the distance between a person and a state of affairs grows sufficiently large, a different type of treatment is called for, and I introduce the notion of moral taint to describe the moral status of agents in these situations.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael J. O'Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield (2011). Moral Differentiation: Exploring Boundaries of the “Monkey See, Monkey Do” Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (3):379-399.
Theodora Issa & David Pick (2010). Ethical Mindsets: An Australian Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):613 - 629.
S. Douglas Beets (2011). Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):193-219.
Lee Shepski (2013). Going the (Ethical) Distance. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2):393-402.
T. Ketola (2006). Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (2):149-161.
Similar books and articles
Fernando Aguiar, Pablo Brañas-Garza & Luis Miller (2008). Moral Distance in Dictators Games. Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4):344-354.
John Cottingham (2000). Caring at a Distance: (Im)Partiality, Moral Motivation and the Ethics of Representation - Partiality, Distance and Moral Obligation. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (3):309 – 313.
Tommy Jensen (2010). Beyond Good and Evil: The Adiaphoric Company. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):425 - 434.
George G. Brenkert (2000). Social Products Liability. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):21-32.
Norman E. Bowie (2005). Management Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
Patrick E. Murphy (2009). The Relevance of Responsibility to Ethical Business Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):245 - 252.
Miranda Fricker (2010). The Relativism of Blame and Williams's Relativism of Distance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):151-177.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #354,010 of 1,902,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #452,252 of 1,902,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?