Supervenience? No chance! Reply to Menuge
Analysis 53 (4):236-239 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Law Logic Mind Physicalism Supervenience Menuge, A | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAndrew R. Bailey (1998). Supervenience and Physicalism. Synthese 117 (1):53-73.
Erhan Demircioglu (2011). Supervenience and Reductive Physicalism. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (1):25-35.
Jessica M. Wilson (2005). Supervenience-Based Formulations of Physicalism. Noûs 39 (3):426-459.
Terence E. Horgan (1993). From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind 102 (408):555-86.
Robert Kirk (1996). Strict Implication, Supervenience, and Physicalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):244-57.
Thomas Gardner (2005). Supervenience Physicalism: Meeting the Demands of Determination and Explanation. Philosophical Papers 34 (2):189-208.
Warren Shrader (2008). On the Relevance of Supervenience Theses to Physicalism. Acta Analytica 23 (3):257-271.
Angus Menuge (1993). Supervenience, by Chance? Reply to Crane and Mellor. Analysis 53 (4):228-235.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,128 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
