Journal of Business Ethics 106 (1):89-101 (2012)
|Abstract||The article starts by arguing that seeing the firm as a mere nexus of contracts or as an abstract entity where different stakeholder interests concur is insufficient for a “humanistic business ethos”, which entails a complete view of the human being. It seems more appropriate to understand the firm as a human community, a concept which can be found in several sources, including managerial literature, business ethics scholars, and Catholic Social Teaching. In addition, there are also philosophical grounds that support the idea of business as a human community. Extending this concept, and drawing from some Phenomenological-Personalist philosophers, we propose that the firm should be seen as a particular “community of persons” oriented to providing goods and services efficiently and profitably. Being a “community of persons” emphasizes both individuals and the whole, and makes explicit the uniqueness, conscience, free will, dignity, and openness to human flourishing. This requires appropriate communication about and participation in matters which affect people’s life, and makes it essential to cooperate for the common good of the business firm and the society|
|Keywords||Aristotle Business as a community Business enterprise Business ethos Catholic Social Teaching Corporation Firm Personalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Subodh P. Kulkarni (2000). Environmental Ethics and Information Asymmetry Among Organizational Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (4):215 - 228.
Domènec Melé (2003). The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1):77 - 88.
Domènec Mele (2001). Loyalty in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):11-26.
Domènec Melé (2009). Integrating Personalism Into Virtue-Based Business Ethics: The Personalist and the Common Good Principles. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):227 - 244.
Antonio Argandoña (1998). The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.
Thomas F. McMahon (1986). Models of the Relationship of the Firm to Society. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):181 - 191.
Eric W. Orts & Alan Strudler (2002). The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):215-234.
Kalle Pajunen (2010). A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):27-32.
Alan Strudler (2002). The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):215-233.
Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington (2003). The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):213 - 226.
Alejo José G. Sison & Joan Fontrodona (2012). The Common Good of the Firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic Tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):211-246.
Bilge Uyan-Atay, Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington (2009). Explaining the Process of Corporate Community Involvement Through the Perspective of the Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:55-67.
Domènec Melé (2009). Business Ethics in Action: Seeking Human Excellence in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Alma Acevedo (2012). Personalist Business Ethics and Humanistic Management: Insights From Jacques Maritain. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):197-219.
Jeremy Galbreath (2006). Are Organisation Researchers Too Obsessed with the Economic Responsibility of the Firm? Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):287 - 295.
Added to index2011-10-14
Total downloads26 ( #53,605 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?