Existence and essence in Thomas and Husserl
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In a series of conversations recorded towards the end of his life, Husserl is quoted as saying, "Yes, I do honor Thomas ..." and "... certainly I admit Thomas was a very great, a colossal phenomenon."1 With this, however, is the assertion that one "must go beyond Thomas."2 What is this going beyond Thomas? The purpose of this essay is to explore this in terms of the distinction between existence and essence we considered in our first chapter when we inquired into the ontological status of the ideas. Our claim is that on this point at least, Husserl is in agreement with Thomas Aquinas. The demand that we go "beyond" him does not concern this distinction. It rather amounts to an implicit call to bring Thomas’ epistemology--in particular, his view of consciousness--up to the level achieved by his metaphysical insights.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Anthony Kenny (1980). Aquinas. Hill and Wang.
Germain Kopaczynski (1985). A Real Distinction in St. Thomas Aquinas? Philosophy Research Archives 11:127-140.
William M. Walton (1951). Being, Essence and Existence for St. Thomas Aquinas (II): Being: That Which Is. Review of Metaphysics 5 (1):83 - 108.
William M. Walton (1950). Being, Essence and Existence for St. Thomas Aquinas: Being and Its Intelligibility. Review of Metaphysics 3 (3):339 - 365.
Sarah Borden Sharkey (2008). Edith Stein and Thomas Aquinas on Being and Essence. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1):87-103.
Leo Sweeney (1963). Existence/Essence in Thomas Aquinas' Early Writings. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 37:97-131.
W. Norris Clarke (1974). What Cannot Be Said in St. Thomas' Essence-Existence Doctrine. New Scholasticism 48 (1):19-39.
Bernardo J. Cantens (2001). A Solution to the Problem of Personal Identity in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:121-134.
Thomas M. Seebohm (1985). Fichte's and Husserl's Critique of Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Husserl Studies 2 (1):53-74.
Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #87,046 of 1,413,232 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,196 of 1,413,232 )
How can I increase my downloads?