David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2006)
In Goodness and Justice, Joseph Mendola develops a unified moral theory that defends the hedonism of classical utilitarianism while evading utilitarianism's familiar difficulties by two modifications. His theory incorporates a new form of consequentialism. When, as is common, someone is engaged in conflicting group acts, it requires that one perform the role in that group that is most beneficent. The theory holds that overall value is distribution-sensitive, ceding maximum weight to the well-being of the worst-off sections of sentient lives. It is properly congruent with commonsense intuition and required by the true metaphysics of value, by the unconstituted natural good found in our world.
|Keywords||Ethics Consequentialism (Ethics Good and evil Justice (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.47 used (80% off) $27.87 new (77% off) $119.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1031.M46 2006|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James H. Moor (1999). Just Consequentialism and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.
Tim Mulgan (2006). Future People: A Moderate Consequentialist Account of Our Obligations to Future Generations. Oxford University Press.
David Cummiskey (2009). Joseph Mendola, Goodness and Justice: A Consequentialist Moral Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Pp. IX + 326. Utilitas 21 (4):521-525.
Peter Vallentyne (1995). Taking Justice Too Seriously. Utilitas 7 (2):207-216.
Joseph Mendola (2005). Consequentialism, Group Acts, and Trolleys. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):64–87.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Campbell Brown (2011). Consequentialize This. Ethics 121 (4):749-771.
Jörg Schroth (2008). Distributive Justice and Welfarism in Utilitarianism. Inquiry 51 (2):123-146.
Robert M. Veatch (1990). Justice in Health Care: The Contribution of Edmund Pellegrino. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (3):269-287.
Ben Bradley (2012). Goodness and Justice. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1):233-243.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #121,334 of 1,793,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,170 of 1,793,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?