David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Husserl Studies 16 (1):41-64 (1999)
At first glance, a phenomenological account of the future seems a contradiction in terms. Phenomenology’s focus is on givenness or presence. Attending to what has already been given in its search for evidence, it seems incapable of handling the future, which by definition, has not yet been given since it not-yet-present. Thus, for the existentialists, in particular Heidegger, phenomenology misses the fact that the Da-, the “thereness” of our Dasein, is located in the future. It misses the futurity inherent in our “being-there” in a world.[i] As part of this, it forgets that “values” are inherent in this world. Attending to the constitution of the thing as already given through its visible features, phenomenology leaves out the quality of its desirability, of its being a thing of value. Such desirability, however, is what moves us to possess it. Desire directs us towards attaining what we do not yet possess, i.e., what is not already given. In this sense, it presents the future. Value or desirability, then, must be thought of in terms of our inherent future directedness. Phenomenology, however, is incapable of this. In fact, its indifference to the future is nowhere more apparent than in its assumption that values are constituted after we grasp a sensuously appearing object. Taking them as something “tacked on” to the latter, it misses the role that futurity plays in our intentional life.[ii]
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Natasa Rakic (1997). Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
Bernard Freydberg (2002). What Becomes of Science in "the Future of Phenomenology"? Research in Phenomenology 32 (1):219-229.
Neal De Roo (2011). Derrida and the Future(s) of Phenomenology. Derrida Today 4 (1):107-131.
David Wood (2006). On Being Haunted by the Future. Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):274-298.
John Russon (2008). Temporality and the Future of Philosophy in Hegel's Phenomenology. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):59-68.
Kyeong-Seop Choi (2007). Philosophy as Rigorous Regional Studies: A Parody of E. Husserl's Philosophy as Rigorous Science. Idealistic Studies 37 (3):203-218.
Ezio Di Nucci (2009). On How to Interpret the Role of the Future Within the Abortion Debate. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
Klaus Held (2007). Phenomenology of 'Authentic Time' in Husserl and Heidegger. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):327 – 347.
Nataša Rakić (1997). Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #91,421 of 1,096,245 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #218,857 of 1,096,245 )
How can I increase my downloads?