Philosophical Explorations 2 (1):59 – 69 (1999)
|Abstract||Much modern liberal political theory takes the concept of autonomy as central and argues that political arrangements are to be assessed, in some part, by their ability to foster the development of individual autonomy understood as being the author of one's own life. This paper argues that so understood, autonomy is less important than is usually thought The liberal requirement that we 'author' our own lives disguises the importance of also being accurate readers of our own lives. I explore the metaphor of reading through a discussion of the character of Nora in Ibsen's Doll's Houseand argue that Nora's case demonstrates the limitations of the liberal understanding of autonomy as involving authorship of one's own life.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Loren E. Lomasky (1990). Liberal Autonomy. Philosophy and Theology 4 (3):297-309.
Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2003). Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
John Philip Christman (ed.) (1989). The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. Oxford University Press.
Gerald Dworkin (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Monique Deveaux (2007). Personal Autonomy and Cultural Tradition. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:87-92.
Lucas Swaine (2010). Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic Virtue and the Chains of Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (1):73-93.
John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson (eds.) (2005). Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #64,434 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?