Supervenience, by chance? Reply to Crane and Mellor
Analysis 53 (4):228-235 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Causation Law Logic Mind Physicalism Supervenience Crane, T Mellor, D H | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. H. Mellor (1988). Crane's Waterfall Illusion. Analysis 48 (June):147-50.
Terence E. Horgan (1993). From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World. Mind 102 (408):555-86.
Tim Crane (1995). Mental Causation, I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69 (69):211-236.
Dorothy Edgington (1997). Mellor on Chance and Causation. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):411-433.
Philip Pettit (1993). A Definition of Physicalism. Analysis 53 (4):213-23.
Robert Kirk (1996). Physicalism Lives. Ratio 9 (1):85-89.
Daniel N. Robinson (1991). On Crane and Mellor's Argument Against Physicalism. Mind 100 (397):135-36.
Tim Crane & D. H. Mellor (1990). There is No Question of Physicalism. Mind 99 (394):185-206.
D. H. Mellor (1993). Supervenience? No Chance! Reply to Menuge. Analysis 53 (4):236-239.
Tim Crane (1993). Reply to Pettit. Analysis 53 (4):224-27.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,255 of 549,600 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,600 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
