David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2006)
Most people know precious little about the risks and benefits of participating in a clinical trial--a medical research study involving some innovative treatment for a medical problem. Yet millions of people each year participate anyway. Patients at Risk explains the reality: that our current system intentionally hides much of the information people need to make the right choice about whether to participate. Witness the following scenarios: -Hundreds of patients with colon cancer undergo a new form of keyhole surgery at leading cancer centersnever -Tens of thousands of women at high risk of developing breast cancer are asked to participate in a major research study. They are told about the option of having both breasts surgically removed but not told about the option of taking a standard osteoporosis pill that might cut the risk of getting breast cancer by one-half or more. Patients at Risk written by two nationally prominent experts, is the first book to reveal the secrets that many in the research establishment have fought long and hard to keep from patients. It shows why options not commonly knownincluding getting a new treatment outside of a research studycan often be the best choice. It explains how patients can make good decisions even if there is only limited information about a treatments effect. And it does this through the eye-opening stories of what is happening daily to thousands of people. Day after day, we are learning how little we know about what really works. Headlines regularly announce that a previously unquestioned treatmenthormone replacement therapy, drugs such as Vioxx or Celebrexmay now be much riskier than we thought. The latest book in a surge of recent books criticizing the medical establishment (but the first to look at clinical trials specifically), Patients at Risk helps to empower patients to survive in a world of medical uncertainty, and makes positive recommendations for systemic reform.
|Keywords||Clinical trials Informed consent (Medical law Human experimentation in medicine Informed Consent Clinical Trials ethics Therapeutic Human Experimentation legislation & jurisprudence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.20 used (90% off) $9.89 new (76% off) $35.18 direct from Amazon (13% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||R853.C55.M46 2006|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jerry Menikoff (2011). Overinterpreting Equipoise. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):13 - 14.
Eric D. Kodish, Kathleen A. Kassimatis & Tsiao Yi Yap (2011). Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization From the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects. Ethics and Behavior 20 (5):380-386.
Jerry Menikoff (2009). The Vulnerability of the Very Sick. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):51-58.
Ana S. Iltis (2008). Reviews in Medical Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):419-424.
Charles J. Kowalski & Jan L. Hewett (2009). Data and Safety Monitoring Boards: Some Enduring Questions. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):496-506.
Similar books and articles
Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) (2003). Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary. Johns Hopkins University Press.
David Wendler (2009). Must Research Participants Understand Randomization? American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
William A. Silverman (1985). Human Experimentation: A Guided Step Into the Unknown. Oxford University Press.
Emma Verástegui (2006). Consenting of the Vulnerable: The Informed Consent Procedure in Advanced Cancer Patients in Mexico. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-12.
Piotr Zaborowski & Adam Górski (2004). Informed Consent and the Use of Placebo in Poland: Ethical and Legal Aspects. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):167-178.
Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) (2008). The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Dennis John Mazur (1998). Medical Risk and the Right to an Informed Consent in Clinical Care and Clinical Research. American College of Physician Executives.
N. Waller Bruce (1995). Individual Autonomy and the Double-Blind Controlled Experiment: The Case of Desperate Volunteers. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #56,514 of 1,088,621 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,621 )
How can I increase my downloads?