Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration 4 (7) (2009)
|Abstract||This paper advances a detailed exploration of the complex relationships among terms, concepts, and synonymy in the UMLS Metathesaurus, and proposes the study and understanding of the Metathesaurus from a model-theoretic perspective. Initial sections provide the background and motivation for such an approach, and a careful informal treatment of these notions is offered as a context and basis for the formal analysis. What emerges from this is a set of puzzles and confusions in the Metathesaurus and its literature pertaining to synonymy and its relation to terms and concepts. A model theory for a segment of the Metathesaurus is then constructed, and its adequacy relative to the informal treatment is demonstrated. Finally, it is shown how this approach clarifies and addresses the puzzles educed from the informal discussion, and how the model-theoretic perspective may be employed to evaluate some fundamental criticisms of the Metathesaurus.|
|Keywords||Synonymy Concepts scientific ontologies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Olaf Mueller (1998). Does the Quine/Duhem Thesis Prevent Us From Defining Analyticity? On Fallacy in Quine. Erkenntnis 48 (1):81 - 99.
Olaf Mueller (1998). Does the Quine/Duhem Thesis Prevent Us From Defining Analyticity? Erkenntnis 48 (1):85-104.
Arnold Cusmariu (1978). About Property Identity. Auslegung 5 (3):139-146.
H. G. Callaway (1996). Synonymy and Analyticity. In Dascal (ed.), Sprachphilosophie, Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung.
Peter Pagin (2003). Quine and the Problem of Synonymy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):171-197.
Theodore J. Everett (2002). Analyticity Without Synonymy in Simple Comparative Logic. Synthese 130 (2):303 - 315.
Peter Pagin (2001). A Quinean Definition of Synonymy. Erkenntnis 55 (1):7-32.
S. D. Rieber (1994). The Paradoxes of Analysis and Synonymy. Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.
Lennart Äqvist (1962). Comments on the Paradox of Analysis. Inquiry 5 (1-4):260-264.
Jan Berg (1968). Remarks on Empirical Semantics. Inquiry 11 (1-4):227 – 242.
Added to index2010-01-14
Total downloads25 ( #55,665 of 722,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?