David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hume Studies 35 (1-2):185-210 (2009)
Hume’s Dissertation on the Passions stands to Book 2 of his Treatise as the first and second Enquiries stand to Books 1 and 3 respectively. However, while the two Enquiries are evidently substantial reworkings of their Treatise ancestors, containing much that is different and new, the Dissertation appears to consist merely of superficially adapted excerpts from Treatise Book 2. I argue that this first impression is mistaken, by showing how Hume’s view of the indirect passions is modified in the later work. In the Treatise, he views them as simple impressions; in the Dissertation, they are complex perceptions, part impression and part idea. I argue, furthermore, that Hume’s account of the origin of the indirect passions only works on this later view, and suggest that this is why he changed his mind. The Dissertation, I conclude, is an improvement on its Treatise forerunner, and not merely a précis of it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hsueh Qu (2012). The Simple Duality: Humean Passions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (sup1):98-116.
Similar books and articles
Mark Collier (2011). Hume's Science of Emotions: Feeling Theory Without Tears. Hume Studies 37 (1):3-18.
James A. Harris (2009). A Compleat Chain of Reasoning: Hume's Project in a Treatise of Human Nature, Books One and Two. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):129-148.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Haruko Inoue (2003). The Origin of the Indirect Passions in the Treatise: An Analogy Between Books 1 and 2. Hume Studies 29 (2):205-221.
Åsa Carlson (2009). There Is Just One Idea of Self in Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 35 (1-2):171-184.
João Paulo Monteiro (2000). Hume's Empiricism and the Rationality of Induction. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:139-149.
Jane L. Mcintyre (2006). Strength of Mind: Prospects and Problems for a Humean Account. [REVIEW] Synthese 152 (3):393 - 401.
David Hume (2007). A Dissertation on the Passions: The Natural History of Religion: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.
Jacqueline Taylor (2007). Hume and the Nortons on the Passions and Morality in Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 33 (2):305-312.
Vadim V. Vasilyev (2013). Hume's Methodology and the Science of Human Nature. History of Philosophy Yearbook 2012:62-115.
David Owen (2009). Hume and the Mechanics of Mind : Impressions, Ideas, and Association. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Anne Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press
Jane L. McIntyre (2000). Hume' Passions: Direct and Indirect. Hume Studies 26 (1):77-86.
Robert S. Henderson (1990). David Hume on Personal Identity and the Indirect Passions. Hume Studies 16 (1):33-44.
Added to index2010-12-01
Total downloads61 ( #78,269 of 1,941,042 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #115,122 of 1,941,042 )
How can I increase my downloads?