“Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: an essay on the philosophical resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic”
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 14 (2):1-37 (2010)
I take up Kant's remarks about a "transcendental deduction" of the "concepts of space and time" (A87/B119-120). I argue for the need to make a clearer assessment of the philosophical resources of the Aesthetic in order to account for this transcendental deduction. Special attention needs to be given to the fact that the central task of the Aesthetic is simply the "exposition" of these concepts. The Metaphysical Exposition reflects upon facts about our usage to reveal our commitment to the idea that these concepts refer to pure intuitions. But the legitimacy of these concepts still hangs in the balance: these concepts may turn out to refer to nothing real at all. The subsequent Transcendental Exposition addresses this issue. The objective validity of the concepts of space and time, and hence their transcendental deduction, hinges on careful treatment of this last point.
|Keywords||Kant Transcendental Aesthetic Transcendental Deduction space and time|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Markku Leppäkoski (1993). The Transcendental How: Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Objective Cognition. Almqvist & Wiksell.
Randy Wojtowicz (1997). The Metaphysical Expositions of Space and Time. Synthese 113 (1):71-115.
Kieran Setiya (2004). Transcendental Idealism in the 'Aesthetic'. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):63–88.
Corey W. Dyck (2011). Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
Robert Hanna (2011). Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Peter Herissone-Kelly (2007). The Transcendental Ideality of Space and the Neglected Alternative. Kant-Studien 98 (3):269-282.
Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael Barker (2001). The Proof Structure of Kant's a-Deduction. Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Added to index2009-12-28
Total downloads176 ( #2,621 of 1,013,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #3,395 of 1,013,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?