Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):627-631 (1997)
|Abstract||Warrant is that, whatever it is, which makes the difference between knowledge and mere true belief. In "Warrant Entails Truth" (PPR, December 1995), I argued that it is impossible that a false belief be warranted. Sharon Ryan attacked the argument of that paper in her "Does Warrant Entail Truth?" (PPR, March 1996). In "More on Warrant's Entailing Truth" I present arguments for the claim that warrant entails truth that are, I think, significantly more compelling than the arguments of my original "Warrant Entails Truth." This paper responds to Ryan's objections, but it is not merely a reply to Ryan's article. It is, rather, a free-standing defense of warrant's entailing truth that is the product of discussion and argument for over two years with many philosophers, including Ryan, over the arguments contained in my original paper|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joel Pust (2000). Warrant and Analysis. Analysis 60 (1):51–57.
Trenton Merricks (1995). Warrant Entails Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):841-855.
Alvin Plantinga (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.
Sharon Ryan (1996). Does Warrant Entail Truth? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):183-192.
Andrew M. Bailey (2010). Warrant is Unique. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):297-304.
John Nolt (2008). Truth as an Epistemic Ideal. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (3):203 - 237.
E. J. Coffman (2008). Warrant Without Truth? Synthese 162 (2):173 - 194.
Michael Huemer (2005). Logical Properties of Warrant. Philosophical Studies 122 (2):171 - 182.
Andrew Moon (2012). Warrant Does Entail Truth. Synthese 184 (3):287-297.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,074 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?