David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 37 (3):535-556 (2009)
Moral discourse allows for speakers to disagree in many ways: about right and wrong acts, about moral theory, about the rational and conative significance of moral failings. Yet speakers’ eccentricities do not prevent them from engaging in moral conversation or from having (genuine, not equivocal) moral disagreement. Thus differences between speakers are compatible with possession of moral concepts. This paper examines various kinds of moral disagreements and argues that they provide evidence against conceptual-role and informational atomist approaches to understanding our moral concepts. Conceptual role approaches fail because they cannot account for shared concepts among speakers with different commitments to the practical and conative ramifications of moral judgments. Informational atomist views fail because speakers need not be locked on to the same moral properties to share moral concepts.
|Keywords||Moral Concepts Disagreement Fodor Jackson Wedgwood|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Julia Annas (2004). Being Virtuous and Doing the Right Thing. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2):61 - 75.
David O. Brink (2001). Realism, Naturalism, and Moral Semantics. Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (02):154-.
David Owen Brink (1989). Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Tyler Burge (1979). Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.
Gary Ebbs (2000). The Very Idea of Sameness of Extension Across Time. American Philosophical Quarterly 37 (3):245 - 268.
Citations of this work BETA
Matti Eklund (2012). Alternative Normative Concepts. Analytic Philosophy 53 (2):139-157.
Tristram McPherson (2013). Semantic Challenges to Normative Realism. Philosophy Compass 8 (2):126-136.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Randel Koons (2001). Emotions and Incommensurable Moral Concepts. Philosophy 76 (4):585-604.
Chengping Zhang (2010). Moral Luck in Thomas Hardy's Fiction. Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 82-94.
Daniel Y. Elstein & Thomas Hurka (2009). From Thick to Thin: Two Moral Reduction Plans. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):pp. 515-535.
Andrew Sikula Sr (1996). Concepts of Moral Management and Moral Maximization. Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):181 – 188.
Kim Lützén & Beatrice Ewalds Kvist (2012). Moral Distress: A Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Understandings and Inter-Related Concepts. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 24 (1):13-25.
Elizabeth Rapaport (1975). Describing Moral Weakness. Philosophical Studies 28 (4):273-280.
Jarrett Zigon (2009). Developing the Moral Person: The Concepts of Human, Godmanhood, and Feelings in Some Russian Articulations of Morality. Anthropology of Consciousness 20 (1):1-26.
David Merli (2008). Expressivism and the Limits of Moral Disagreement. Journal of Ethics 12 (1):25 - 55.
John Jung Park (2013). Prototypes, Exemplars, and Theoretical & Applied Ethics. Neuroethics 6 (2):237-247.
Added to index2009-02-02
Total downloads110 ( #9,362 of 1,101,566 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #35,036 of 1,101,566 )
How can I increase my downloads?