Resemblance

Sign Systems Studies 38 (1/4):91-128 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondnessand Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinkingcharacteristic of semiosis — that is, the process by which everything is always becoming something other than what it was becoming — and at the same time itincludes linear, bivalent classical logic as a subset. Certain aspects of the Dao, Buddhist philosophy, and Donald Davidson’s ‘radical interpretation’ affordadditional, and perhaps unexpected, support for the initial set of three premises.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Firstness, evolution and the absolute in Peirce's Spinoza.Shannon Dea - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 603-628.
Resemblance nominalism and counterparts.Alexander Bird - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):221–228.
Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
Resemblance theories of properties.Alexander Paseau - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):361-382.
Wittgensteinian semantics.Michael Pelczar - 2000 - Noûs 34 (4):483–516.
Family resemblance.Hans Sluga - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):1-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references