Leibniz on compossibility

Philosophy Compass 4 (6):962-977 (2009)
Abstract
Leibniz's well-known thesis that the actual world is just one among many possible worlds relies on the claim that some possibles are incompossible , meaning that they cannot belong to the same world. Notwithstanding its central role in Leibniz's philosophy, commentators have disagreed about how to understand the compossibility relation. We examine several influential interpretations and demonstrate their shortcomings. We then sketch a new reading, the cosmological interpretation, and argue that it accommodates two key conditions that any successful interpretation must satisfy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jean-Pascal Anfray (2002). God's Decrees and Middle Knowledge. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):647-670.

View all 14 references

Citations of this work BETA
Larry M. Jorgensen (2013). Michael V. Griffin: Leibniz, God and Necessity. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):371-375.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-11-26

Total downloads

35 ( #50,328 of 1,102,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.