Planck-scale physics: Facts and beliefs
Foundations of Science 12 (4) (2007)
| Abstract | The relevance of the Planck scale to a theory of quantum gravity has become a worryingly little examined assumption that goes unchallenged in the majority of research in this area. However, in all scientific honesty, the significance of Planck’s natural units in a future physical theory of spacetime is only a plausible, yet by no means certain, assumption. The purpose of this article is to clearly separate fact from belief in this connection. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
John Norton (1987). The Logical Inconsistency of the Old Quantum Theory of Black Body Radiation. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):327-350.
Hasok Chang (1997). Can Planck's Constant Be Measured with Classical Mechanics? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):223 – 243.
T. Maudlin (2004). Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale: Contemporary Theories in Quantum Gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (3):531-537.
Gordon Belot & John Earman (2001). Pre-Socratic Quantum Gravity. In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Ulrich Hoyer (1984). Ludwig Boltzmann Und Das Grundlagenproblem der Quantentheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 15 (2):201-210.
Carlo Rovelli (2001). Quantum Spacetime: What Do We Know? In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,124 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |

