David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:97-102 (2006)
What do theodicies do? This paper argues that we can evaluate and respond to theodicies more effectively if we ask, as pragmatists, what problems we are trying to solve, whether we solve them effectively, and whether these are the problems we should be addressing. Some maintain that, beyond defending religious beliefs, theodicies also address deep emotional needs. I argue that we would do better to abandon theodicies of hidden meaning, acknowledge honestly that bad things happen, and seek comfort and meaning by bringing about whatever good is possible in the situation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bradley Monton (2010). Against Multiverse Theodicies. Philo 13 (2):113-135.
Andrew Chignell (1998). The Problem of Infant Suffering. Religious Studies 34 (2):205-217.
Nick Trakakis (2004). Second Thoughts on the Alleged Failure of Free Will Theodicies. Sophia 43 (2):87-93.
Jakob Hohwy (2006). Internalized Meaning Factualism. Philosophia 34 (3):325-336..
Mark Maller (2009). Animals and the Problem of Evil in Recent Theodicies. Sophia 48 (3):299-317.
Nathan Nobis (2002). The Real Problem of Infant and Animal Suffering. Philo 5 (2):216-225.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Nick Trakakis (2003). On the Alleged Failure of Free Will Theodicies: A Reply to Tierno. Sophia 42 (2):99-106.
Miles Little (1999). Assisted Suicide, Suffering and the Meaning of a Life. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):287-298.
Jamie Mayerfeld (1999). Suffering and Moral Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
C. J. L. Talmage (1994). Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning. Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Robert C. Cummins & Martin Roth (forthcoming). Meaning and Content in Cognitive Science. In Richard Schantz (ed.), Prospects for Meaning. de Gruyter.
Graeme Marshall (2012). The Problem of Religious Language 'Look at It This Way' (Wittgenstein). Sophia 51 (4):479-493.
Michael Scott (1996). The Morality of Theodicies. Religious Studies 32 (1):1 - 13.
Bradley Rives (2009). The Empirical Case Against Analyticity: Two Options for Concept Pragmatists. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (2):199-227.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads1 ( #434,761 of 1,098,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #287,293 of 1,098,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?