Suffering, Meaning, and Pragmatism

What do theodicies do? This paper argues that we can evaluate and respond to theodicies more effectively if we ask, as pragmatists, what problems we are trying to solve, whether we solve them effectively, and whether these are the problems we should be addressing. Some maintain that, beyond defending religious beliefs, theodicies also address deep emotional needs. I argue that we would do better to abandon theodicies of hidden meaning, acknowledge honestly that bad things happen, and seek comfort and meaning by bringing about whatever good is possible in the situation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/wcp212006847
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Miles Little (1999). Assisted Suicide, Suffering and the Meaning of a Life. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):287-298.
Michael Scott (1996). The Morality of Theodicies. Religious Studies 32 (1):1 - 13.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

6 ( #322,845 of 1,725,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #166,949 of 1,725,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.