David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 51 (3):351-363 (2012)
Abstract In this article we develop a relational understanding of sociality, that is, an account of social life that takes relation as primary. This stands in contrast to the common assumption that relations arise when subjects interact, an account that gives logical priority to separation. We will develop this relational understanding through a reading of the work of Martin Buber, a social philosopher primarily interested in dialogue, meeting, relationship, and the irreducibility and incomparability of reality. In particular, the article contrasts Buber’s work with that of poststructuralist theorists who take as their starting point the deconstruction of the Hegelian logic of binary oppositions. Deconstruction understands difference as the excess that undoes the binary, but Buber, we argue, shows how difference derives from the primacy and ontological undefinability of relation. Relational logic does not exclude the logic of separations and oppositions: relation is the primal ground that makes separations possible. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-13 DOI 10.1007/s11841-011-0278-9 Authors Andrew Metcalfe, School of Social Sciences and International Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Ann Game, School of Social Sciences and International Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Journal Sophia Online ISSN 1873-930X Print ISSN 0038-1527.
|Keywords||Relation Binary opposition Desire Love Difference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Bernasconi & David Wood (eds.) (1988). The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other. Routledge.
David Bohm (1996). On Dialogue. Routledge.
Martin Buber (1970). I and Thou. New York,Scribner.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexandre Guilherme (2012). God as Thou and Prayer as Dialogue: Martin Buber's Tools for Reconciliation. [REVIEW] Sophia 51 (3):365-378.
A. Guilherme & W. John Morgan (2010). Martin Buber: Dialogue and the Concept of the Other. Pastoral Review.
Stephen Healy (2011). Putting the Mangle to the Test. Metascience 20 (3):525-528.
Paul Arthur Schilpp (1967). The Philosophy of Martin Buber. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court.
A. Guilherme & W. John Morgan (2009). Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Education and its Implications for Non-Formal Education. International Journal of Lifelong Learning 28 (5).
Nicolas Rasmussen (2012). Book Notice. [REVIEW] Metascience 21 (1):251-252.
David Oldroyd (2011). Humboldtian Science. Metascience 20 (3):581-584.
Muhammad Kamal (2012). Existence and Non-Existence in Sabzawari's Ontology. Sophia 51 (3):395-406.
Morgan Luck (2010). Conferring on Religion: Notes From the 2010 Australasian Philosophy of Religion Association Conference. Sophia 49 (4):521-521.
Henrika Kuklick (2011). Stuart Macintyre, The Poor Relation. A History of Social Sciences in Australia. Minerva 49 (3):355-358.
David Oldroyd (2012). Early Geology in Focus. Metascience 21 (3):569-573.
Stephen Healy (2012). Imagination and Reason: Rival Perspectives on Science. [REVIEW] Metascience 21 (3):587-589.
Alex Guilherme & W. John Morgan (2011). Peace Profile: Martin Buber. Peace Review 23 (1):110-117.
Karyn Lai (2012). Kam-Por Yu, Julia Tao, and Philip J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theories and Applications. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (1):119-124.
Added to index2011-11-07
Total downloads18 ( #100,258 of 1,139,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #66,126 of 1,139,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?