The constructive realist account of science and its application to Ilya Prigogine's conception of laws of nature
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 14 (3):239-248 (2009)
Sciences are often regarded as providing the best, or, ideally, exact, knowledge of the world, especially in providing laws of nature. Ilya Prigogine, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for his theory of non-equilibrium chemical processes—this being also an important attempt to bridge the gap between exact and non-exact sciences [mentioned in the Presentation Speech by Professor Stig Claesson (nobelprize.org, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1977)]—has had this ideal in mind when trying to formulate a new kind of science. Philosophers of science distinguish theory and reality, examining relations between these two. Nancy Cartwright’s distinction of fundamental and phenomenological laws, Rein Vihalemm’s conception of the peculiarity of the exact sciences, and Ronald Giere’s account of models in science and science as a set of models are deployed in this article to criticise the common view of science and analyse Ilya Prigogine’s view in particular. We will conclude that on a more abstract, philosophical level, Prigogine’s understanding of science doesn’t differ from the common understanding.
|Keywords||Exact sciences Ilya Prigogine Laws of nature Models in science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Nancy Cartwright (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.
I. Prigogine (1984). Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Distributed by Random House.
Ronald N. Giere (1991). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
Cliff Hooker (1980). From Being to Becoming Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Bird (2005). The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws. Foundations of Science 10 (4):353-70.
Leo Näpinen & Peeter Müürsepp (2002). The Concept of Chaos in Contemporary Science: On Jean Bricmont's Critique of Ilya Prigogine's Ideas. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 7 (4):465-479.
Nancy Cartwright (1999). The Limits of Exact Science, From Economics to Physics. Perspectives on Science 7 (3):318-336.
Charles Smith (2005). Meeting a World in Crisis: On Unlearning, Fresh Perception and Alignment with Life's Fundamental Trend: A Tribute to C. West Churchman, Pir Vilayat Khan, and Ilya Prigogine. World Futures 61 (8):600 – 610.
Olimpia Lombardi (2012). Prigogine and the Many Voices of Nature. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (3):205-219.
Ilya Prigogine (1994). Science, Reason and Passion. World Futures 40 (1):35-43.
Cliff Hooker (1984). Book Review:From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences Ilya Prigogine. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 51 (2):355-.
Leo Näpinen (2007). The Need for the Historical Understanding of Nature in Physics and Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 9 (1):65-84.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads228 ( #6,794 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #48,707 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?