Graduate studies at Western
Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):549-571 (2003)
|Abstract||To have an ontology is to interpret a world. In this paper we argue that the brain, viewed as a representational system aimed at interpreting our world, possesses an ontology too. It creates primitives and makes existence assumptions. It decomposes target space in a way that exhibits a certain invariance, which in turn is functionally significant. We will investigate which are the functional regularities guiding this decomposition process, by answering to the following questions: What are the explicit and implicit assumptions about the structure of reality, which at the same time shape the causal profile of the brain's motor output and its representational deep structure, in particular of the conscious mind arising from it (its ''phenomenal output'')? How do they constrain high-level phenomena like conscious experience, the emergence of a first-person perspective, or social cognition? By reviewing a series of neuroscientific results and integrating them with a wider philosophical perspective, we will emphasize the contribution the motor system makes to this process. As it will be shown, the motor system constructs goals, actions, and intending selves as basic constituents of the world it interprets. It does so by assigning a single, unified causal role to them. Empirical evidence demonstrates that the brain models movements and action goals in terms of multimodal representations of organism-object-relations. Under a representationalist analysis, this process can be conceived of as an internal, dynamic representation of the intentionality-relation itself. We will show how such a complex form of representational content, once it is in place, can later function as a functional building block for social cognition and for a more complex, consciously experienced representation of the first-person perspective as well|
|Keywords||Brain Cognition Consciousness Decomposition Function Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Woodruff Smith (2000). Ontological Phenomenology. In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 7: Modern Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Doc Ctr.
Eric LaRock (2008). Is Consciousness Really a Brain Process? International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):201-229.
Dan Lloyd (1997). Consciousness and its Discontents. Communication and Cognition 30 (3-4):273-284.
Y. Rossetti (1998). Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):520-558.
William M. Kallfelz (2009). Physical Emergence and Process Ontology. Process Studies 65 (1):42 – 60.
Thomas W. Clark (2005). Killing the Observer. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (4-5):38-59.
Thomas Metzinger (2003). Motor Ontology: The Representational Reality of Goals, Actions and Selves. Philosophical Psychology 16 (3):365-388.
Vittorio Gallese & Thomas Metzinger (2003). Motor Ontology: The Representational Reality of Goals, Actions and Selves. Philosophical Psychology 16 (3):365 – 388.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,927 of 740,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,452 of 740,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?