Ratio 16 (2):161–177 (2003)
|Abstract||Many religious thinkers hold the immortality requirement, the view that immortality of some kind is necessary for life to have meaning. After clarifying the nature of the immortality requirement, this essay examines three central arguments for it. The article establishes that existing versions of these arguments fail to entail the immortality requirement. The essay then reconstructs the arguments, and it shows that once they do plausibly support the immortality requirement, they equally support the God-centred requirement, the view that God's existence is a necessary condition for life to be meaningful. The paper concludes by explaining why we should expect any argument for the immortality requirement also to constitute an argument for the God-centred requirement.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aaron Smuts (2011). Immortality and Significance. Philosophy and Literature 35 (1):134-149.
Lisa Bortolotti & Yujin Nagasawa (2009). Immortality Without Boredom. Ratio 22 (3):261-277.
Andrew McLaughlin (1970). Rationality and Total Evidence. Philosophy of Science 37 (2):271-278.
Norman Cousins (1974/1991). The Celebration of Life: A Dialogue on Hope, Spirit, and the Immortality of the Soul. Bantam Books.
Aaron Smuts (2008). Wings of Desire: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality. Film and Philosophy 13 (1):137-151.
Joanna K. Forstrom (2010). John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy. Continuum.
William Ernest Hocking (1937/1973). The Meaning of Immortality in Human Experience. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
Tamara Monet Marks (2010). Kierkegaard's "New Argument" for Immortality. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (1):143-186.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads84 ( #9,133 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #16,099 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?