David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hastings Center Report 40 (5):10-11 (2010)
Many feel the Common Rule treats an unwieldy range of activities identically under the monolithic label "human subjects research." Past objections centering on the conflation of biomedical and behavioral research have gained new currency with the increase in biobanking and Internet-based research. A more nuanced approach to research is overdue. Regulation will no doubt remain a major component of any new approach. But in some research contexts, investigators and subjects should be permitted to reach voluntary, informed agreements about certain aspects of their relationship.Consider the National Institutes of Health's new "Guidelines for Human Stem Cell Research."1 The guidelines owe their existence to the NIH's ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) (2003). Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Adil E. Shamoo (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford University Press.
Bernard Dickens, International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (December 2006).
Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming (2011). New Rules for Research with Human Participants? Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Christine Kirk (2000). Research Guidelines: NIH Issues Guidelines for Federally Funded Stem Cell Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):411-413.
Michelle N. Meyer James W. Fossett (2009). The More Things Change: The New Nih Guidelines on Human Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):pp. 289-307.
Michelle N. Meyer & James W. Fossett (2009). The More Things Change: The New NIH Guidelines on Human Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):289-307.
Elizabeth H. Bassett & Kate O'Riordan (2002). Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the Human Subjects Research Model. Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):233-247.
David Kennamer (2005). What Journalists and Researchers Have in Common About Ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):77 – 89.
M. Quigley (2007). Non-Human Primates: The Appropriate Subjects of Biomedical Research? Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Franklin G. Miller, Michelle M. Mello & Steven Joffe (2008). Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: What Do Investigators Owe Research Participants? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):271-279.
Jeremy Sugarman (2010). Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
R. R. Kishore (2006). Biomedical Research and Mining of the Poor: The Need for Their Exclusion. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):175-183.
Sara Svensson & Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Protecting People in Research: A Comparison Between Biomedical and Traffic Research. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):99-115.
Added to index2010-09-29
Total downloads7 ( #203,584 of 1,413,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?