David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Matter 2 (2):91-103 (2004)
Although Niels Bohr's notion of complementarity is usually referred to in the context of quantum mechanics, it is not of physical origin. Bohr derived it from the philosophical idea of a holistic entanglement of knowledge and action. Bohr's complementarity primarily refers to a key element of the pragmatist tradition, the reflective relation between the immediate experience of an object and the awareness of its objectification. Similar relations have been observed by Kurt Goldstein in his studies of brain-injured patients. From a pragmatic point of view, Goldstein's idea of adequacy in biological knowledge might lead to novel approaches to current ethical questions in medicine as well as biotechnology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Simon Saunders (2005). Complementarity and Scientific Rationality. Foundations of Physics 35 (3):417-447.
Dugald Murdoch (1987). Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Henry J. Folse (1986). Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:96 - 104.
M. S. (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73 – 93.
S. Müller‐Markus (1966). Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy∗. Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93.
Matthew J. Brown (2014). Quantum Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45:1-10.
Michael Cuffaro (2010). The Kantian Framework of Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #126,840 of 1,012,894 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,884 of 1,012,894 )
How can I increase my downloads?