Conservative extension in relevant implication
Studia Logica 31 (1):39 - 48 (1973)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMarcello D'agostino, Dov M. Gabbay & Alessandra Russo (1997). Grafting Modalities Onto Substructural Implication Systems. Studia Logica 59 (1):65-102.
Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley (1974). E is a Conservative Extension of Eī. Philosophia 4 (2-3):223-249.
Philip Kremer (1997). Defining Relevant Implication in a Propositionally Quantified S. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Edwin D. Mares (2000). Ce is Not a Conservative Extension of E. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):263-275.
Keith Daynes (1989). Sets as Singularities in the Intensional Universe. Studia Logica 48 (1):111 - 128.
Miklós Ferenczi (2009). On Conservative Extensions in Logics with Infinitary Predicates. Studia Logica 92 (1):121 - 135.
Michiro Kondo (1989). A1 is Not a Conservative Extension of S4 but of S. Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (3):321 - 323.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,586 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
