David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2):250 (1999)
A perennial subject of dispute in the Western philosophical tradition is whether human agents can be responsible for their actions even if determinism is true. By determinism, I mean the view that everything that happens is completely determined by antecedent causes. One of the least impressive objections that is leveled against determinism confuses determinism with a very different view that has come to be known as “fatalism”: this is the view that everything is determined to happen independently of human choices, efforts, and deliberations. It is a common fallacy, among students contemplating the implications of determinism for the first time, to argue: “But if everything is determined in advance, then it doesn't matter what we decide to do; what is determined to happen will happen no matter what.” This argument fallaciously infers fatalism from determinism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Solomon (2003). On Fate and Fatalism. Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454.
Susan Sauvé Meyer (2009). Chain of Causes : What is Stoic Fate? In Ricardo Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford University Press
Robert B. Pippin (2011). Fatalism in American Film Noir: Some Cinematic Philosophy. University of Virginia Press.
Sarah Broadie (2001). From Necessity to Fate: A Fallacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 5 (1):21-37.
Steven M. Cahn (1967). Fate, Logic, and Time. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Michael Gelven (1991). Why Me?: A Philosophical Inquiry Into Fate. Northern Illinois University Press.
Margaret Visser (2002). Beyond Fate. House of Anansi Press.
Alexander (ed.) (1983). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Fate: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Duckworth.
Ardaser Sorabjee N. Wadia (1931). Fate and Free-Will. Toronto, J.M. Dent & Sons, Ltd..
J. den Boeft (ed.) (1970). Calcidius on Fate. Leiden,Brill.
Paul Russell (2000). Compatibilist Fatalism. In A. van den Beld (ed.), Moral Responsibility and Ontology. Kluwer 199--218.
Xunwu Chen (2011). Crisis and Possibility: The Ethical Implication of Contingency. Asian Philosophy 21 (3):257 - 268.
Susan Haack (1974). On a Theological Argument for Fatalism. Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):156-159.
Edgar John Phillips (1947). Beauty for Ashes. [Madison, Wis.,Democrat Printing Company.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads17 ( #227,336 of 1,934,371 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,317 of 1,934,371 )
How can I increase my downloads?