How to be consistent without saving the greater number

Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2):136–146 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00059.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Saving the greater number without combining claims.Iwao Hirose - 2001 - Analysis 61 (4):341–342.
Should the probabilities count?Katharina Berndt Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):205-218.
The Mixed Solution to the Number Problem.Martin Peterson - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):166-177.
The distribution of numbers and the comprehensiveness of reasons.Veronique Munoz-Darde - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):207–233.
Aggregation and numbers.Iwao Hirose - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):62-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#174,820)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kirsten Meyer
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Citations of this work

Each Counts for One.Daniel Muñoz - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
The Many, the Few, and the Nature of Value.Daniel Muñoz - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):70-87.
Who Is Afraid of Numbers?S. Matthew Liao - 2008 - Utilitas 20 (4):447-461.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Contractualism on saving the many.R. Kumar - 2001 - Analysis 61 (2):165-170.
Skepticism about Saving the Greater Number.Michael Otsuka - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):413-426.

Add more references