David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Taking the novels of Jane Austen as an exploration of Joseph Raz's problem of authority in law, this paper explores whether a positivist account of authority maps onto Austen's account of human experience. While both Austen and Raz agree that the source of authority cannot itself be an exclusionary reason, Austen's novels suggest that social role and emotional connection play a bigger role in evaluating authority than Raz's account would suggest. Most notably, Austen's characterization of her heroine Fanny Price suggests that a non-positivist stance toward authority may generate more moral criticism of law than a positivist approach.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
B. Roermund (2000). Authority and Authorisation. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):201-222.
Catherine Searle (1984). Outdoor Scenes in Jane Austen's Novels. Thought 59 (4):419-431.
Stephen Darwall (2011). Authority, Accountability, and Preemption. Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.
E. M. Dadlez (2009). Mirrors to One Another: Emotion and Value in Jane Austen and David Hume. Wiley-Blackwell.
E. M. Dadlez (2008). Form Affects Content: Reading Jane Austen. Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 315-329.
Daniel Star & Candice Delmas (2011). Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence 2 (1):143-160.
Scott Hershovitz (2011). The Role of Authority. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (7).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #136,258 of 1,008,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,266 of 1,008,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?