David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):332-341 (2009)
Constructivism claims to be a postepistemology that replaces 'traditional' concepts of knowledge. Supporters of constructivism have argued that progress requires that pre-service teachers be weaned off traditional approaches and that they should adopt constructivist views of knowledge. Constructivism appears to be gaining ground rapidly and should no longer be viewed as an exercise in radical thinking primarily aimed at generating innovative teaching. It has become an integral part of the pedagogic mainstream. Close examination of the theoretical foundations of constructivism, however, reveals that the basic assumptions of constructivism are flawed. Far from being a postepistemology, constructivism simply regresses to a pre-Renaissance mindset with theology replaced with a psychologism. Constructivists should be aware that the implications of constructivism for future generations may be both profound and non-benign.
|Keywords||theory of knowledge radical constructivism constructivism knowledge epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books.
Roy Bhaskar (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Routledge.
Arthur Koestler (1962). The Sleepwalkers. Journal of Philosophy 59 (18):500-503.
D. C. Phillips & Nicholas C. Burbules (2001). Postpositivism and Educational Research. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):109-111.
Citations of this work BETA
Pauli Siljander (2011). What Are We Looking For?—Pro Critical Realism in Text Interpretation. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):493-510.
Vasco D'Agnese (2015). ‘And They Lived Happily Ever After’: The Fairy Tale of Radical Constructivism and von Glasersfeld's Ethical Disengagement. Ethics and Education 10 (2):131-151.
Similar books and articles
Mark Olssen (1996). Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism. British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
D. I. Dykstra (2010). Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is Not an Easy One. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):22-30.
L. E. E. George (2011). Reconsidering Constructivism in Qualitative Research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (4):403-412.
Thomas M. Besch (2004). On Practical Constructivism and Reasonableness. Dissertation, University of Oxford
Alexander Riegler & Andreas Quale (2010). Editorial: Can Radical Constructivism Become a Mainstream Endeavor? Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):1-5.
K. H. Müller (2010). The Radical Constructivist Movement and Its Network Formations. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):31-39.
A. Scholl (2010). Radical Constructivism in Communication Science. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
H. Gash (2010). Realities in Radical Constructivism. Commentary on Johnson's “Footprints in the Sand”. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):100-101.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #49,061 of 1,935,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,049 of 1,935,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?