Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37 (2006)
|Abstract||There are many parallels between the role of possible worlds in modal logic and that of times in tense logic. But the similarities only go so far, and it is important to note where the two come apart. This paper argues that even though worlds and times play similar roles in the model theories of modal and tense logic, there is no tense analogue of the possible-worlds analysis of modal operators. An important corollary of this result is that presentism cannot be the tense analogue of actualism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Josh Parsons (2003). A–Theory for Tense Logicians. Analysis 63 (277):4–6.
M. J. Cresswell (2010). Temporal Reference in Linear Tense Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2).
Hiroakira Ono & Akira Nakamura (1980). On the Size of Refutation Kripke Models for Some Linear Modal and Tense Logics. Studia Logica 39 (4):325 - 333.
Heather Dyke (1998). Real Times and Possible Worlds. In Robin le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of time and tense. Oxford University Press.
Takashi Yagisawa (2010). Worlds and Individuals, Possible and Otherwise. Oxford University Press.
Takashi Yagisawa (2002). Primitive Worlds. Acta Analytica 17 (1):19-37.
Edward N. Zalta (1987). On the Structural Similarities Between Worlds and Times. Philosophical Studies 51 (2):213-239.
Ulrich Meyer (2009). ”Now' and ”Then' in Tense Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229--47.
Ulrich Meyer (2009). Times in Tense Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50:201--19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #16,450 of 549,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?