Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Dissertation, University of Stirling (2010)
| Abstract | This thesis discusses some central aspects of Wittgenstein's conception of language and logic in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and brings them into relation with the philosophies of Frege and Russell. The main contention is that a fruitful way of understanding the Tractatus is to see it as responding to tensions in Frege's conception of logic and Russell's theory of judgement. In the thesis the philosophy of the Tractatus is presented as developing from these two strands of criticism and thus as the culmination of the philosophy of logic and language developed in the early analytic period. Part one examines relevant features of Frege's philosophy of logic. Besides shedding light on Frege's philosophy in its own right, it aims at preparing the ground for a discussion of those aspects of the Tractatus' conception of logic which derive from Wittgenstein's critical response to Frege. Part two first presents Russell's early view on truth and judgement, before considering several variants of the multiple relation theory of judgement, devised in opposition to it. Part three discusses the development of Wittgenstein's conception of language and logic, beginning with Wittgenstein's criticism of the multiple relation theory and his early theory of sense, seen as containing the seeds of the picture theory of propositions presented in the Tractatus. I then consider the relation between Wittgenstein's pictorial conception of language and his conception of logic, arguing that Wittgenstein's understanding of sense in terms of bipolarity grounds his view of logical complexity and of the essence of logic as a whole. This view, I show, is free from the internal tensions that affect Frege's understanding of the nature of logic. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDenis McManus (2006/2010). The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford University Press.
María Cerezo (2005). The Possibility of Language: Internal Tensions in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Dawn M. Phillips (2006). Clear as Mud. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:277-294.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1971). Prototractatus. Ithaca, N.Y.,Cornell University Press.
Matthew B. Ostrow (2002). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Dialectical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
Marie McGinn (2006/2009). Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. Oxford University Press.
Alfred Nordmann (2005). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Dawn M. Phillips (2007). Complete Analysis and Clarificatory Analysis in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Michael Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge.
Ian Proops (2002). The Tractatus on Inference and Entailment. In Erich Reck (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Essays on Early Analytic Philosophy, 283–307. Oxford University Press.
Mary Tiles (1980). Kant, Wittgenstein and the Limits of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):151-170.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922/1999). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dover Publications.
Christopher Campbell (2011). Categorial Indeterminacy, Generality and Logical Form in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1).
Ian Proops (2001). Logical Syntax in the Tractatus. In Richard Gaskin (ed.), Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-04-28Total downloads48 ( #22,348 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,781 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
