David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):463-469 (2005)
This article offers a critique of the recently revised BMA guidance on routine neonatal male circumcision and seeks to challenge the assumptions underpinning the guidance which construe this procedure as a matter of parental choice. Our aim is to problematise continued professional willingness to tolerate the non-therapeutic, non-consensual excision of healthy tissue, arguing that in this context both professional guidance and law are uncharacteristically tolerant of risks inflicted on young children, given the absence of clear medical benefits. By interrogating historical medical explanations for this practice, which continue to surface in contemporary justifications of non-consensual male circumcision, we demonstrate how circumcision has long existed as a procedure in need of a justification. We conclude that it is ethically inappropriate to subject children—male or female—to the acknowledged risks of circumcision and contend that there is no compelling legal authority for the common view that male circumcision is lawful
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
British Medical Association (2004). The Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision: Guidance for Doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):259-263.
Michael Benatar & David Benatar (2003). Between Prophylaxis and Child Abuse: The Ethics of Neonatal Male Circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):35-48.
David Shaw (2009). Cutting Through Red Tape: Non-Therapeutic Circumcision and Unethical Guidelines. Clinical Ethics 4 (4):181-186.
B. Lyons (2013). Male Infant Circumcision as a 'HIV Vaccine'. Public Health Ethics 6 (1):90-103.
Rida Usman Khalafzai (2008). Male Circumcision - Facts and Fiction. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (4):6.
Dale Dorsey (2010). Preferences, Welfare, and the Status-Quo Bias. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):535-554.
Armand H. Matheny Antommaria (2003). I Paid Out-of-Pocket for My Son's Circumcision at Happy Valley Tattoo and Piercing: Alternative Framings of the Debate Over Routine Neonatal Male Circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):50-52.
P. Nowell-Smith (1989). Euthanasia and the Doctors--A Rejection of the BMA's Report. Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):124-128.
R. V. Short (2004). Male Circumcision: A Scientific Perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-241.
S. A. Abu-Sahlieh (1995). No Distinction Between Male and Female Circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):311-311.
Wendy Lipworth, Miles Little, Pippa Markham, Jill Gordon & Ian Kerridge (2013). Doctors on Status and Respect: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):205-217.
Mark Sheldon (2003). Male Circumcision, Religious Preferences, and the Question of Harm. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):61-62.
Paul J. Ford (2003). Physician Obligation, Cultural Factors, and Neonatal Male Circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):58-59.
Sarah E. Waldeck (2003). Social Norm Theory and Male Circumcision: Why Parents Circumcise. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):56-57.
Caroline McGee Jones (2003). Neonatal Male Circumcision: Ethical Issues and Physician Responsibility. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):59-60.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #216,592 of 1,692,449 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #111,548 of 1,692,449 )
How can I increase my downloads?