David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):205-223 (1988)
The typically dismissive treatment of Bradleian idealism, to the extent that it is based on philosophical criticism rather than historical bias, suffers from a failure to distinguish Bradley's negative views from his positive doctrines. But the intermingling of the two plays havoc in Bradley's own presentation, so that proper interpretation requires a particularly aggressive approach to the texts. Specifically, in denying a real multiplicity of facts, Bradley, though he may seem to be, is not attacking the commonsense belief that there are many and disparate facts. His claim, as is confirmed by an examination of the analysis of judgement in The principles of logic, is that the facts ordinarily recognized are not those of the bona fide fact-pluralist, e.g. Mill. By getting Bradley's position straight, it becomes possible to tell an illuminating story about the early formation of ?analytic? philosophy, with its often bewildering faith in the ontological significance of logic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
M. H. Laine & P. J. Kelly (1990). The J. S. Mill Bibliography: Recent Additions. Utilitas 2 (2):345.
Similar books and articles
F. H. Bradley (1994). Writings on Logic and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Guy Stock (ed.) (1998). Appearance Versus Reality: New Essays on Bradley's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
F. H. Bradley (1963). The Principles of Logic. [London]Oxford University Press.
Fred Wilson (1998). Bradley's Critique of Associationism. Bradley Studies 4 (1):5-60.
Francesco Orilia (2009). Bradley's Regress and Ungrounded Dependence Chains: A Reply to Cameron. Dialectica 63 (3):333-341.
Raymond Bradley (1992). The Nature of All Being: A Study of Wittgenstein's Modal Atomism. Oxford University Press.
Holger Leerhoff (2008). Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
W. J. Mander (1994). An Introduction to Bradley's Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads1 ( #672,433 of 1,780,583 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,583 )
How can I increase my downloads?