Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-10 (2007)
BackgroundCurrent anti-doping in competitive sports is advocated for reasons of fair-play and concern for the athlete's health. With the inception of the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA), anti-doping effort has been considerably intensified. Resources invested in anti-doping are rising steeply and increasingly involve public funding. Most of the effort concerns elite athletes with much less impact on amateur sports and the general public.DiscussionWe review this recent development of increasingly severe anti-doping control measures and find them based on questionable ethical grounds. The ethical foundation of the war on doping consists of largely unsubstantiated assumptions about fairness in sports and the concept of a "level playing field". Moreover, it relies on dubious claims about the protection of an athlete's health and the value of the essentialist view that sports achievements reflect natural capacities. In addition, costly antidoping efforts in elite competitive sports concern only a small fraction of the population. From a public health perspective this is problematic since the high prevalence of uncontrolled, medically unsupervised doping practiced in amateur sports and doping-like behaviour in the general population (substance use for performance enhancement outside sport) exposes greater numbers of people to potential harm. In addition, anti-doping has pushed doping and doping-like behaviour underground, thus fostering dangerous practices such as sharing needles for injection. Finally, we argue that the involvement of the medical profession in doping and anti-doping challenges the principles of non-maleficience and of privacy protection. As such, current anti-doping measures potentially introduce problems of greater impact than are solved, and place physicians working with athletes or in anti-doping settings in an ethically difficult position. In response, we argue on behalf of enhancement practices in sports within a framework of medical supervision.SummaryCurrent anti-doping strategy is aimed at eradication of doping in elite sports by means of all-out repression, buttressed by a war-like ideology similar to the public discourse sustaining international efforts against illicit drugs. Rather than striving for eradication of doping in sports, which appears to be an unattainable goal, a more pragmatic approach aimed at controlled use and harm reduction may be a viable alternative to cope with doping and doping-like behaviour
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bengt Kayser, Alexandre Mauron & Andy Miah (2007). Current Anti-Doping Policy: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):2.
Brent M. Kious (2008). Philosophy on Steroids: Why the Anti-Doping Position Could Use a Little Enhancement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):213-234.
Andy Miah (2007). Genetics, Bioethics and Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
Andy Miah (2012). Genetic Technologies and Sport: The New Ethical Issue. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (1):32-52.
Søren Holm (2007). Doping Under Medical Control - Conceptually Possible but Impossible in the World of Professional Sports? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):135 – 145.
Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee (2010). Philosophy on Steroids: A Reply. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (6):401-410.
Andy Miah, From Anti-Doping to a 'Performance Policy' Sport Technology, Being Human, and Doing Ethics.
Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee (2011). Harm, Risk, and Doping Analogies: A Counter-Response to Kious. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):201-207.
John Gleaves (2011). The Ethics of Doping and Anti-Doping: Redeeming the Soul of Sport? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (1):75-78.
Lev Kreft (2009). The Elite Athlete - In a State of Exception? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 3 (1):3-18.
Andy Miah, Citation, Please Cite the Printed Work: Miah, A. (2006) Rethinking Enhancement in Sport, in Bainbridge, W.S. & Roco, M.C. 'Progress in Convergence: Technologies for Human Wellbeing.' Annals of The. [REVIEW]
Eric Chwang (2011). Why Athletic Doping Should Be Banned. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):33-49.
John Gleaves (2011). No Harm, No Foul? Justifying Bans On Safe Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):269-283.
Martin Hardie (2014). Making Visible the Invisible Act of Doping. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (1):85-119.
Added to index2011-11-16
Total downloads8 ( #162,852 of 1,096,547 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #253,460 of 1,096,547 )
How can I increase my downloads?