Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):112 – 134 (2001)
|Abstract||We argue in favor of the adaptive value of acceptance and that it deserves a definite status within the 'positive paradigm'. Acceptance currently suffers from ambiguous connotations because of its lack of optimistic biases and its similarity to resignation. We endeavor to show that acceptance and resignation are distinct attitudes by exploring their relationships with various phenomena-frustration, disappointment, expectation, positive thinking, replanning, and accuracy. The resulting distinguishing features of acceptance-thriving versus returning to baseline; realistic optimism versus hopelessness; persistence and flexible replanning versus disengagement-are crucial for adaptive coping, and appear to be in keeping with the positive paradigm.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi (2010). Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility. Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Robert Audi (2008). Belief, Faith, and Acceptance. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):87 - 102.
Paul E. Staes (1972). Positive Self-Regard and Authentic Morality. [Manila]Loyola School of Theology.
Allen Carlson (1984). Nature and Positive Aesthetics. Environmental Ethics 6 (1):5-34.
Pascal Engel (1998). Believing, Holding True, and Accepting. Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):140 – 151.
Raimo Tuomela (2000). Belief Versus Acceptance. Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):122 – 137.
Keith Frankish (2009). Adaptive Misbelief or Judicious Pragmatic Acceptance? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):520 - 521.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,419 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?