Book Review:Mind and Medicine: Problems of Explanation and Evaluation in Psychiatry and the Biomedical Sciences Larry Laudan

Philosophy of Science 52 (2):321- (1985)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation 		Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,705
External links
    • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    M. H. S. (1975). Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences. The Review of Metaphysics 29 (2):340-340.
    Lukas van Oudenhove & Stefaan E. Cuypers (2010). The Philosophical "Mind-Body Problem" and Its Relevance for the Relationship Between Psychiatry and the Neurosciences. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4).
    H. Tristram Engelhardt & Stuart F. Spicker (eds.) (1975). Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences: Proceedings of the First Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine, Held at Galveston, May 9-11, 1974. [REVIEW] D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Paul Hammersley (2008). Book Review of Alternatives Beyond Psychiatry by Peter Stastny and Peter Lehmann (Eds). [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1):1-2.
    Ernan McMullin (1979). Laudan's Progress and Its Problems:Progress and Its Problems Larry Laudan. Philosophy of Science 46 (4):623-.
    John C. Moskop (1982). Book Review:Philosophy and Medicine Series. H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Stuart F. Spicker; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 1: Explanation and Evaluation in the Biomedical Sciences. H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Stuart F. Spicker; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 2: Philosophical Dimensions of the Neuro-Medical Sciences. Stuart F. Spicker, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 3: Philosophical Medical Ethics: Its Nature and Significance. Stuart F. Spicker, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 4. Mental Health: Philosophical Perspectives. H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Stuart F. Spicker; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 5: Mental Illness: Law and Public Policy. Baruch A. Brody, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 6: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr., Stuart F. Spicker, Bernard Towers; Philosophy and Medicine Series. Vol. 7. Organism, Medicine, and Metaphysi. [REVIEW] Ethics 92 (2):381-.
    Michael Root (2001). The Problem of Race in Medicine. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):20-39.
    Samuel B. Guze (1992). Why Psychiatry is a Branch of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
    Antonio Diéguez-Lucena (2006). Why Does Laudan's Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):393 - 403.
    D. B. Double (2007). Adolf Meyer's Psychobiology and the Challenge for Biomedicine. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (4):pp. 331-339.
    David L. Hull, Andrew Lugg, Robert E. Butts & I. C. Jarvie (1979). Review Symposium : Laurens Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1977. Pp. X + 257. $10.00. Laudan's Progress and its Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):457-465.
    Kristin Shrader-Frechette (1997). Book Review:The Book of Risks: Fascinating Facts About the Chances We Take Every Day Larry Laudan. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 64 (3):521-.
    Larry Laudan (1997). How About Bust? Factoring Explanatory Power Back Into Theory Evaluation. Philosophy of Science 64 (2):306-316.
    Alex C. Michalos (1977). Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences. Edited by H.T. Engelhardt and S.F. Spicker. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company 1975. 240 Pages. $28.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 16 (03):541-542.
    R. Burian (1985). Book Reviews : Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences. By Michael Ruse. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1981. Pp. XIX + 299. Hardback, U.S. $42; Paperback, U.S. $14.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1):111-114.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-08-24

    Total downloads

    2 ( #232,628 of 549,198 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    		There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums




    Applied ethicsEpistemologyHistory of Western PhilosophyMeta-ethicsMetaphysicsNormative ethics
    Philosophy of biologyPhilosophy of languagePhilosophy of mindPhilosophy of religionScience Logic and MathematicsMore ...
    Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | The Categorization Project | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us

    Hosted by The Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London
    This site uses Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by David Bourget and David Chalmers

    Page generated Fri May 24 18:59:29 2013 - Hash code: HNS4fy/9zclMKEIKTrWNvA