Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):459 - 465 (2011)
|Abstract||Some believe reality is dynamic: time passes, not just in our experience of reality, but objectively, in reality itself. There are many objections to this view. I focus on the rate objection: that time passes only if it passes at the rate of 1 second per second, but that it cannot coherently pass at that rate. Existing replies to this objection do not fully engage with its motivation. My aim is to refute the rate objection. Time can coherently pass at the rate of 1 second per second. This does not conclusively show that time passes, but it removes one of the main obstacles to believing that it does|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roman Frigg, Review of 'the Images of Time. An Essay on Temporal Representation' by Robin le Poidevin. [REVIEW]
Simon Prosser (2013). Passage and Perception. Noûs 47 (1):69-84.
Ned Markosian (1992). On Language and the Passage of Time. Philosophical Studies 66 (1):1 - 26.
Ned Markosian (1993). How Fast Does Time Pass? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):829-844.
Brad Skow (2011). On the Meaning of the Question “How Fast Does Time Pass?”. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):325-344.
Ian Phillips (2009). Rate Abuse: A Reply to Olson. Analysis 69 (3):503-505.
Eric T. Olson (2009). The Rate of Time's Passage. Analysis 69 (1):3-9.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads79 ( #12,191 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?