Erratum to: Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 163 (2):575-575 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Epistemic two-dimensionalism and the epistemic argument.Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78.
Against vague existence.Theodore Sider - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):135 - 146.
Rigidification and attitudes.Bryan Pickel - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):43-58.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2005 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Frank Jackson & Michael Smith.
Soames and widescopism.David Hunter - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 123 (3):231 - 241.
In defence of three-dimensionalism.Kit Fine - 2006 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:1-16.
Soames’s Deflationism About Modality.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (6):1367-1379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-20

Downloads
67 (#234,137)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Michels
Universidade de Lisboa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Josep Macia (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford University Press. pp. 55-140.

Add more references