David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 45 (171):20 - 32 (1970)
The question “What is humour?” has exercised in varying degrees such philosophers as Aristotle, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Schopenhauer and Bergson and has traditionally been regarded as a philosophical question. And surely it must still be regarded as a philosophical question at least in so far as it is treated as a conceptual one. Traditionally the question has been regarded as a search for the essence of humour, whereas nowadays it has become almost a reflex response among some philosophers to dismiss the search for essences as misconceived. Humour, it will be said, is a family-resemblance concept: no one could hope to compile any short list of essential properties abstracted from all the many varieties of humour— human misfortune and clumsiness, obscenity, grotesqueness, veiled insult, nonsense, wordplay and puns, human misdemeanours and so on, as manifested in forms as varied as parody, satire, drama, clowning, music, farce and cartoons. Yet even if the search for the essence of humour seems at first sight unlikely to succeed, I do not see how we can be sure in advance of any conceptual investigation; and in any case we might do well to start with the old established theories purporting to give the essence of humour, for even if they are wrong they may be illuminatingly wrong and may help us to compile a list of typical characteristics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Joshua Shaw (2010). Philosophy of Humor. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):112-126.
Similar books and articles
Shayne Clarke (2009). Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (4):311-330.
Paul Schulten (2004). Late-Antique Humour G. Halsall (Ed.): Humour, History and Politics in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages . Pp. XIV + 208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Cased, £37.50/Us$50. Isbn: 0-521-81116-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):449-.
Michael Clark (1987). Humour, Laughter and the Structure of Thought. British Journal of Aesthetics 27 (3):238-246.
George C. W. Warr (1892). Butler's Humour of Homer The Humour of Homer. A Lecture by Samuel Butler. Cambridge: Metcalfe. 1892. The Classical Review 6 (09):398-399.
David Owen (2011). Must the Tolerant Person Have a Sense of Humour? On the Structure of Tolerance as a Virtue. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (3):385-403.
John Lippitt (1994). Humour and Incongruity. Cogito 8 (2):147-153.
Françoise Badelon (1999). Entre satire et humour, Shaftesbury et le thé'tre élisabéthain. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2:161-172.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads47 ( #77,892 of 1,781,282 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #295,025 of 1,781,282 )
How can I increase my downloads?