David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):785-788 (1993)
A historical example is considered which conflicts with Laudan's Problem Solving Model . In the period 1840–85 chemists preferred a theory with 3 major conceptual problems (the Liebig Theory of Acids) to Lavoisier's which had only one major conceptual problem (why are the halogen hydrides acids?). The overall conceptual merits of Lavoisier's scheme have been revived in the modern Lux-Flood classification of Acids. Larry Laudan ,  proposed a problem solving model of scientific rationality which not only applied to global theories but, if one takes the final paragraph of his  seriously, also applies to sub theories, auxiliary hypotheses and sub auxiliary hypotheses all the way down the line
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
F. Michael Akeroyd (1993). Laudan's Problem Solving Model. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):785-788.
Matthias Kaiser (1993). Philosophers Adrift? Comments on the Alleged Disunity of Method. Philosophy of Science 60 (3):500-512.
David Pearce (1984). Research Traditions, Incommensurability and Scientific Progress. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):261-271.
Jim Davies, Nancy J. Nersessian & Ashok K. Goel (2005). Visual Models in Analogical Problem Solving. Foundations of Science 10 (1):133-152.
A. A. Derksen (1986). The Justificational Priority of Science Over the Philosophy of Science: Laudan's Science and Hypothesis. Philosophy of Science 53 (2):259-264.
Howard Sankey (1996). Normative Naturalism and the Challenge of Relativism: Laudan Versus Worrall on the Justification of Methodological Principles. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.
Andrew Lugg (1979). Review Symposium : Laudan and the Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress and Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):466-474.
Dongming Xu (2010). Beyond Simon's Means-Ends Analysis: Natural Creativity and the Unanswered 'Why' in the Design of Intelligent Systems for Problem-Solving. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (3):327-347.
M. A. van Rees (2001). The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions. Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
Alvin I. Goldman (1983). Epistemology and the Theory of Problem Solving. Synthese 55 (1):21 - 48.
Kirsten Walsh (2009). Has Laudan Killed the Demarcation Problem? Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Lillian Hoddeson (2002). Toward a History-Based Model for Scientific Invention: Problem-Solving Practices in the Invention of the Transistor and the Development of the Theory of Superconductivity. Mind and Society 3 (1):67-79.
Barbara Von Eckardt (1990). Some Remarks on Laudan's Theory of Scientific Rationality. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:153-167.
Jaakko Hintikka (1984). The Logic of Science as a Model-Oriented Logic. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:177 - 185.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads9 ( #378,845 of 1,934,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?