David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (1):52-64 (2008)
In this article I defend Freud’s method of dream interpretation against those who criticise it as involving a fallacy—namely, the reverse causal fallacy—and those who criticise it as permitting many interpretations, indeed any that the interpreter wants to put on the dream. The first criticism misconstrues the logic of the interpretative process: it does not involve an unjustified reversal of causal relations, but rather a legitimate attempt at an inference to the best explanation. The judgement of whether or not a particular interpretation is the best explanation depends on the details of the case in question. I outline the kinds of probabilities involved in making the judgement. My account also helps to cash out the metaphors of the jigsaw and crossword puzzles that Freudians have used in response to the ‘many interpretations’ objection. However, in defending Freud’s method of dream interpretation, I do not thereby defend his theory of dreams, which cannot be justified by his interpretations alone.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sigmund Freud & A. A. Brill (1913). The Interpretation of Dreams. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (20):551-555.
Jim Hopkins (1988). Epistemology and Depth Psychology. In C. Wright & P. Clark (eds.), Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science. Blackwell
Neil C. Manson (2003). Freud's Own Blend: Functional Analysis, Idiographic Explanation, and the Extension of Ordinary Psychology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):179–195.
Clark Glymour (1983). The Theory of Your Dreams. In R. Cohen & L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis. D. Reidel 57--71.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Lynch (2014). The Vagaries of Psychoanalytic Interpretation: An Investigation Into the Causes of the Consensus Problem in Psychoanalysis. Philosophia 42 (3):779-799.
Similar books and articles
J. P. Lowson (1923). Freud and Rivers: A Note on Dream Interpreation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):111 – 113.
H. Wildon Carr (1914). The Philosophical Aspect of Freud's Theory of Dream Interpretation. Mind 23 (91):321-334.
M. Tjiattas (2001). Interdisciplinary Methodology: The Case of Kitcher's Freud. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):535-555.
Edmond Wright (2000). The Joke, the" As If", and the Statement'. In M. Levine (ed.), The Analytic Freud. Routledge 294--311.
Michael Schredl (2006). Repression and Dreaming: An Open Empirical Question. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):531-532.
J. Allan Hobson (2000). The Ghost of Sigmund Freud Haunts Mark Solms's Dream Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):951-952.
James D. Marshall (2008). Wittgenstein, Freud, Dreaming and Education: Psychoanalytic Explanation as 'Une Façon de Parler'. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (5):606-620.
Nadav Matalon (2011). The Riddle of Dreams. Philosophical Psychology 24 (4):517 - 536.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #130,427 of 1,790,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #322,104 of 1,790,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?