Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (2):170-186 (2011)
|Abstract||Contemporary psychiatry maintains the myth that it is value neutral by appeal to modern medical science for both its diagnostic categories and its therapeutic interventions, leaving the impression that it relies on reason—that is to say, reason divorced from tradition—to master human nature. Such a practice has a certain way of characterizing and defining humanity's lapses from acceptable human behavior—a lapse from human being. The modern practice of psychiatry applies a particular notion (largely influenced by Enlightenment ideals) of scientific instrumentation to the human person in order to diagnose the ailment and manufacture a corresponding treatment in keeping with a hidden conception of human biological flourishing. This covert vision is an impoverished (and possibly dangerous) one. As much as the practice of psychiatry is constrained by the goals of the dominant moral tradition of our day, it becomes a tool (or technique) for achieving the transient and partial ends of modern individualism. Given this truncated view of human nature and human end, modern psychiatry fails to attend comprehensively to the unity of a life, missing altogether the essential relevance of character formation, and thereby forfeiting excellence in human flourishing|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel A. Putman (1988). Virtue and the Practice of Modern Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (4):433-443.
Joel Paris (2008). Prescriptions for the Mind: A Critical View of Contemporary Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Gerben Meynen & Jacco Verburgt (2009). Psychopathology and Causal Explanation in Practice. A Critical Note on Heidegger's Zollikon Seminars. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (1):57-66.
James Phillips (ed.) (2009). Philosophical Perspectives on Technology and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Norah Martin (2001). Feminist Bioethics and Psychiatry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):431 – 441.
Joseph Loizzo (1997). Intersubjectivity in Wittgenstein and Freud: Other Minds and the Foundations of Psychiatry. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (4).
John C. Markowitz (1990). The Future of Psychiatry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (1):5-19.
Anthony W. Clare (1976/1979). Psychiatry in Dissent: Controversial Issues in Thought and Practice. Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
KWM Bill Fulford & Giovanni Stanghellini (2008). The Third Revolution: Philosophy Into Practice in Twenty-First Century Psychiatry. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1):5-14.
Bradley Lewis (2000). Psychiatry and Postmodern Theory. Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (2):71-84.
Pat Bracken & Philip Thomas (2010). Is Private (Contract-Based) Practice an Answer to the Problems of Psychiatry? Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (3):241-245.
Pieter R. Adriaens & Andreas de Block (eds.) (2011). Maladapting Minds: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Evolutionary Theory. Oxford University Press.
D. B. Double (ed.) (2006). Critical Psychiatry: The Limits of Madness. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-03-01
Total downloads6 ( #154,860 of 739,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?