Philosophical Papers 37 (1):1-26 (2008)
|Abstract||‘Responsibilist' approaches to epistemology link knowledge and justification with epistemically responsible belief management, where responsible management is understood to involve an essential element of guidance by recognized epistemic norms. By contrast, reliabilist approaches stress the de facto reliability of cognitive processes, rendering epistemic self-consciousness as inessential. I argue that, although an adequate understanding of human knowledge must make room for both responsibility and reliability, philosophers have had a hard time putting them together, largely owing to a tendency, on the part of responsibilists, to adopt an overly demanding, hyperintellectualized conception of what epistemic responsibility demands. I trace this tendency towards hyper-intellectualism to a wish to meet scepticism head on, a wish that enforces adherence to a particular model of the structure of epistemic justification. I argue that a more humanly reasonable conception of epistemic justification suggests an alternative model. With this model in hand, we can both deflect sceptical problems and combine responsibility with reliability in a satisfying way. Philosophical Papers Vol. 37 (1) 2008: pp. 1-26|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Audi (2009). Reliability as a Virtue. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):43 - 54.
Peter Murphy (2006). Reliability Connections Between Conceivability and Inconceivability. Dialectica 60 (2):195-205.
Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit (2003). Reliability of Information on the Internet: Some Distinctions. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
Michael Liston (1993). Reliability in Mathematical Physics. Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-21.
Michael A. Bishop (2000). In Praise of Epistemic Irresponsibility: How Lazy and Ignorant Can You Be? Synthese 122 (1-2):179 - 208.
Stefan Schubert (2012). Is Coherence Conducive to Reliability? Synthese 187 (2):607-621.
Marcel Boumans (2004). The Reliability of an Instrument. Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):215 – 246.
Joel Pust (2004). On Explaining Knowledge of Necessity. Dialectica 58 (1):71–87.
Anusorn Singhapakdi, Scott J. Vitell, Kumar C. Rallapalli & Kenneth L. Kraft (1996). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1131 - 1140.
Stefan Schubert (2012). Coherence Reasoning and Reliability: A Defense of the Shogenji Measure. Synthese 187 (2):305-319.
Stefan Schubert (2011). Coherence and Reliability: The Case of Overlapping Testimonies. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 74 (2):263-275.
Julia Lackmann, Jürgen Ernstberger & Michael Stich (2012). Market Reactions to Increased Reliability of Sustainability Information. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):111-128.
Bryan W. Husted (1993). Reliability and the Design of Ethical Organizations: A Rational Systems Approach. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):761 - 769.
Mark E. Wunderlich (2003). Vector Reliability: A New Approach to Epistemic Justification. Synthese 136 (2):237 - 262.
Ernest Sosa (2002). Reliability and the a Priori. In John Hawthorne & Tamar Gendler (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads82 ( #11,444 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,756 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?