David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Deleuze Studies 4 (3):356-380 (2010)
George Orwell has often been accused of articulating a naive version of empiricism in his writings. Naive empiricism can be said to be based on the belief that an external objective world exists independently of us which can nevertheless be studied and observed by constructing atomistic theories of causality between objects in the world. However, by revisiting some of Orwell's most well-known writings, this paper argues that it makes more sense to place his empiricism within the contours of Deleuze's empiricist philosophy. By recourse to Deleuze's ideas the paper argues that far from being a naive empiricist Orwell in fact engages in a reflexive exploration of his virtual affects through the particular events he writes about. The assemblage that is ‘George Orwell’ is thus comprised by a whole array of affects from this unique middle-class socialist as he crosses through particular events. Orwell subsequently acts as a ‘schizoid nomad’ who transverses the affects of others. As a result Orwell takes flight from his own middle-class surroundings in order to reterritorialise his identity within the affects, habits and sensations of others. By becoming a schizoid nomad Orwell is able to construct a critical and passionate moral standpoint against forces of domination.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari (1991). What is Philosophy? Columbia University Press.
Gilles Deleuze (2005). Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Gilles Deleuze (1988). Foucault. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Citations of this work BETA
John Michael Roberts (2014). How Are George Orwell’s Writings a Precursor to Studies of Popular Culture? Journal for Cultural Research 18 (3):216-232.
Similar books and articles
William S. Robinson (1994). Orwell, Stalin, and Determinate Qualia. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75 (2):151-64.
David Dwan (2010). Truth and Freedom in Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. Philosophy and Literature 34 (2):381-393.
Richard A. Posner (2000). Orwell Versus Huxley: Economics, Technology, Privacy, and Satire. Philosophy and Literature 24 (1):1-33.
Peter van Inwagen (2008). Was George Orwell a Metaphysical Realist? Philosophia Scientiae 12 (1):161-185.
Peter S. Wenz (1986). The Critique of Berkeley's Empiricism In Orwell's 1984. Idealistic Studies 16 (2):133-152.
George Orwell (1946). James Burnham and the Managerial Revolution. [London, Socialist Book Centre.
Richard White (2008). George Orwell: Socialism and Utopia. Utopian Studies 19 (1):73 - 95.
P. McKenzie (1982). George Orwell, 'Seeing' and 'Saying': A Reply to Francis Dunlop. Journal of Philosophy of Education 16 (2):255–263.
Martin Gardner (1950). Book Review:Nineteen Eighty-Four. George Orwell. [REVIEW] Ethics 60 (2):144-.
John P. Rossi (1988). Orwell and Chesterton. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 63 (4):313-326.
Peter Skagestad (1986). Pragmatism and the Closed Society: A Juxtaposition of Charles Peirce and George Orwell. Philosophy and Social Criticism 11 (4):307-329.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1992). Orwell and the Anti-Realists. Philosophy 67 (260):141 - 154.
Added to index2010-11-23
Total downloads20 ( #232,153 of 1,926,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #453,420 of 1,926,184 )
How can I increase my downloads?