Reasonably Traditional: Self-Contradiction and Self-Reference in Alasdair MacIntyre's Account of Tradition-Based Rationality
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (3):315 - 339 (2002)
Alasdair MacIntyre's account of tradition-based rationality has been the subject of much discussion, as well as the object of some recent charges of inconsistency. The author considers arguments by Jennifer Herdt, Peter Mehl, and John Haldane which attempt to show that MacIntyre's account of rationality is, in some way, inconsistent. It is argued that the various charges of inconsistency brought against MacIntyre by these critics can be understood as variations on two general types of criticism: (1) that MacIntyre's account of tradition-based rationality presents a picture of rationality with inconsistent internal elements, and (2) that MacIntyre, in the act of presenting his picture of rationality, makes the sort of claims to which his own account of rationality denies legitimacy, and thus MacIntyre's account is self-referentially incoherent. In response to criticisms of the first sort, it is argued that MacIntyre can further clarify or develop his position to take the current criticisms into account without altering the fundamental aspects of his picture of rationality. In response to the charge of self-referential incoherence, it is argued that the charge rests on a mistaken understanding of MacIntyre's position and of the nature of justification. In dealing with these arguments, the author hopes to not only vindicate MacIntyre's account of rationality against the charges of some of its recent critics, but also to shed some light on the nature of arguments both for and against relativism and historicism
|Keywords||relativism MacIntyre self–reference tradition–based rationality justification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Stephen Lutz (2011). Alasdair MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Enquiry. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):391-413.
Matthew Freytag (1994). MacIntyre's Conservatism and Its Cure. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (2):1-10.
Paul Hager (2011). Refurbishing MacIntyre's Account of Practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):545-561.
Andrew Jason Cohen (1999). In Defense of Nietzschean Genealogy. Philosophical Forum 30 (4):269–288.
John Flett (1999). Alasdair MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Enquiry in Polanyian Perspective. Tradition and Discovery 26 (2):6-20.
Bruce W. Ballard (1995). MacIntyre and the Limits of Kierkegaardian Rationality. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):126-132.
Kent Reames (1999). Metaphysics, History, and Rational Justification: A Maclntyrean Response to Franklin Gamwell's Critique. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):257 - 281.
Jack Russell Weinstein, The Invisible Hand of Rationality: On the Intersection of Adam Smith and Alasdair MacIntyre.
M. Kuna (2005). Macintyre on Tradition, Rationality, and Relativism. Res Publica 11 (3):251-273.
John Haldane (1994). Macintyre's Thomist Revival : What Next? In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press
John Horton & Susan Mendus (1994). Alasdair Macintyre : After Virtue and After. In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press
Robert Stern (1994). Macintyre and Historicism. In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press
John R. Williams (2008). Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair Macintyre. By Thomas D. D'Andrea. Heythrop Journal 49 (3):513–515.
John J. Davenport (2009). Thomas D. D'Andrea, Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair Macintyre. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4):559-565.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads24 ( #174,133 of 1,938,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #125,144 of 1,938,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?