Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):237-258 (2013)
|Abstract||How much responsibility ought a professional engineer to have with regard to supporting basic principles of sustainable development? While within the United States, professional engineering societies, as reflected in their codes of ethics, differ in their responses to this question, none of these professional societies has yet to put the engineer’s responsibility toward sustainability on a par with commitments to public safety, health, and welfare. In this paper, we aim to suggest that sustainability should be included in the paramountcy clause because it is a necessary condition to ensure the safety, health, and welfare of the public. Part of our justification rests on the fact that to engineer sustainably means among many things to consider social justice, understood as the fair and equitable distribution of social goods, as a design constraint similar to technical, economic, and environmental constraints. This element of social justice is not explicit in the current paramountcy clause. Our argument rests on demonstrating that social justice in terms of both inter- and intra-generational equity is an important dimension of sustainability (and engineering). We also propose that embracing sustainability in the codes while recognizing the role that social justice plays may elevate the status of the engineer as public intellectual and agent of social good. This shift will then need to be incorporated in how we teach undergraduate engineering students about engineering ethics|
|Keywords||Engineering codes of ethics Engineering education Paramountcy clause Social justice Sustainability|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven P. Nichols (1997). Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3).
Cletus S. Brauer (forthcoming). Just Sustainability? Sustainability and Social Justice in Professional Codes of Ethics for Engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics.
P. Aarne Vesilind (2002). Vestal Virgins and Engineering Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):92-101.
Christelle Didier & Antoine Derouet (forthcoming). Social Responsibility in French Engineering Education: A Historical and Sociological Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Joseph R. Herkert (2001). Future Directions in Engineering Ethics Research: Microethics, Macroethics and the Role of Professional Societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):403-414.
Charles E. Harris (1998). Engineering Responsibilities in Lesser-Developed Nations: The Welfare Requirement. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):321-331.
Simon Robinson (ed.) (2007). Engineering, Business and Professional Ethics. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Simon Robinson & Ross Dixon (1997). The Professional Engineer: Virtues and Learning. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3).
Joseph R. Herkert (1998). Sustainable Development, Engineering and Multinational Corporations: Ethical and Public Policy Implications. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):333-346.
C. E. Harris (2004). Internationalizing Professional Codes in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):503-521.
Michael Davis (2001). The Professional Approach to Engineering Ethics: Five Research Questions. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):379-390.
Charles E. Harris (2008). The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2).
Michael Davis (1998). Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. Oxford University Press.
Joseph R. Herkert (2005). Ways of Thinking About and Teaching Ethical Problem Solving: Microethics and Macroethics in Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3).
Vivian M. Weil (1998). Professional Standards: Can They Shape Practice in an International Context? Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):303-314.
Added to index2011-09-26
Total downloads13 ( #87,888 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?